Tag Archives: Benedict Cumberbatch

Avengers: Endgame (2019) Blu Ray Movie Review By D.M. Anderson

Avengers: Endgame Review

Directors: Anthony Russo, Joe Russo
Writers: Christopher Markus (screenplay by), Stephen McFeely (screenplay by)
Stars: Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Hemsworth, Scarlett Johansson, Jeremy Renner, Don Cheadle, Paul Rudd, Brie Larson, Benedict Cumberbatch, Chadwick Boseman, Tom Holland, Karen Gillan, Zoe Saldana, Evangeline Lilly, Bradley Cooper, Josh Brolin, Chris Pratt, Tilda Swindon, Dave Bautista, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Elizabeth Olsen, Tessa Thompson, Benedict Wong

The major downside to catching Avengers: Endgame in theatres was the risk of subjecting my bladder to irreparable damage. In my younger days, simply holding-it for three hours was no big challenge. Back in college, I even once participated in a drinking challenge where we’d see who could go the longest without relieving ourselves. I didn’t win, but did manage to make it almost four hours.

Those were different times and Endgame is a different type of epic. We’ve all sat through three-hour films before, but thanks to the Infinity War’s open-ended resolution and plethora of unanswered questions – not-to-mention a year’s worth of fan theories and speculation – taking a bathroom break would risk missing a key scene, plot twist or revelation. I’ll give the Russo Brothers credit for one thing: Every scene in Endgame feels vital at the time, making it a tough movie to walk away from, even for a moment.

At the showing my family and I attended, not a single theatregoer got up to leave once the film started. Afterwards, the continuous sound of flushing toilets echoed throughout the lobby for five straight minutes. I, for one, made the mistake of buying a soda before the movie, which I began the regret around the 90 minute mark. By the third act, my screaming bladder made it a challenge to fully immerse myself the film’s numerous emotional payoffs.

So despite being a fitting, larger-than-life capper to Marvel’s 22-film story arc, Endgame ultimately plays better at home, at least for those of us not endowed with iron bladders. In addition to reacquainting myself with the story thus-far by revisiting Infinity War beforehand, seeing Endgame a second time – able to hit pause when nature called – was far more enjoyable.

While I still loathe the practice of stretching a single story across multiple movies, Endgame justifies its existence – and length – due to the sheer number of characters, story threads and loose ends to tie in a manner that meets expectations of legions of MCU fans. A taunting task, to be sure, which Endgame manages to pull off. The film remembers its past while acknowledging the future, and is well-aware of the finality its title suggests (for the story arc and some major characters). In that respect, Endgame pushes all the right emotional buttons.

But unlike the original Star Wars trilogy’s most iconic moments, Endgame meets expectations without really ever exceeding them. As viewers, we already have a laundry list of plot points awaiting explanation, questions to be answered and characters’ odds of living or dying. All those boxes are checked-off – often magnificently, sometimes poignantly – but there aren’t any revelations as jaw-dropping as learning who Luke’s father is. And even at three hours, there are simply too many characters for everyone to get adequate screen time (some don’t even appear until the climax). Fans of certain characters will inevitably be disappointed by what amounts to a cameo.

However, those are minor quips. Endgame is ultimately a slam-bang crescendo to this massive franchise, the likes of which we won’t likely see again for a long time. While sweeping and epic in scope, it’s still filled with the smaller, character-driven moments that have always made the MCU engaging (something DC is just now figuring out). I’ve personally never met anyone disappointed by the outcome. I’m sure they’re out there, but maybe their bladders were simply too full to enjoy it the first time.

Advertisements

The Child In Time (2017) Movie Review by John Walsh

CHILD IN TIME

Director: Julian Farino
Writers: Stephen Butchard (adaptation), Ian McEwan (based on the novel by)
Stars: Benedict Cumberbatch, Kelly Macdonald, Stephen Campbell Moore

So Benedict Cumberbatch stepped into the role of producer come actor for his BBC short film, Child In Time. I was eagerly anticipating it’s showing on Sunday night, purely because the former was involved, and I wasn’t disappointed. An adaptation of the Ian McEwan novel of the same name, it does fall foul of the usual admissions and artistic licence that comes with an adaptation, but by all accounts does a very decent job of portraying the story.

Plot wise, it’s about a middle-class, London, family struggling to come to terms with the disappearance of their four year old daughter Kate. Her father Stephen (Cumberbatch) is seen returning home in clear distress and anguish during the opening scenes, having to explain everything to his stricken wife Julie (Kelly Macdonald). It has to be said the opening ten minutes are heart wrenching, emotionally powerful stuff and I’m not even a parent. The sight of Stephen calling out for his daughter with the realisation of what’s happening dawning on him was hard to watch. The acting ability of the films two protagonists, Benedict in particular, is certainly showcased early on.

It then switches up things, jumping three years ahead to really focus on the strain the loss of Kate has had in the ensuing time on Stephen and Julie’s relationship. Unsurprisingly, the two part ways after several fights, with the latter heading off to live alone in a rural setting, whilst the former, now a children’s book author and member of an educational, government committee struggles to cope and gain closure. Macdonald manages to convey the conflicted emotions that Julie has towards her husband brilliantly, most most notably the unmistakable bitterness over his involvement and yet unconditional love despite it.

Stephen, between regular trips to see his wife, also has to deal with his best friend, Charles (Stephen Campbell Moore) suffering from an apparent mental illness and seemingly regressing back to his earlier years. Moore delivers an odd performance as the even stranger character of Charles. A man that climbs trees like a teenager, excitedly builds a den in the woods and decides to inexplicably trim his nether regions for no apparent reason. It’s a brilliant performance however that traces the heartache and suffering that mental illness has on the sufferer, their family and friends. His demise was tragic and only served to add to his friends suffering.

It almost delves into some sci-fi elements in the middle with a hint at time warps, shifts or inter-dimensional theories to explain Kate’s disappearance. Stephen has a weird moment where he apparently glimpses his younger mother in a pub before he was born and there’s the frequent flashes of his daughter in her yellow mac, chatter over a baby monitor, not to mention the visions of a mysterious little boy that the ending perhaps explains to some extent. Indeed, I’ve seen that the novel (which I haven’t read) focuses on this to an even greater extent, whilst also hammering home the political message. Something the film only briefly touches upon with a clear dig at the cold, uncaring May government of today (though it’s more of a Cameron style, Etonian gonk who plays PM in it).

Ultimately though, I think Child In Time’s main purpose is to really examine the effects of grieve, the loss of a child, the effects that loss has on relationships and love itself. It shirks the political message in favour of the human struggle, showing that even in the darkest of places there’s always light at the end of the tunnel. It does this well mostly thanks to the excellent performances and well crafted script. I enjoyed the film, it did lull a just little in the middle to end, but was a decent and intriguing enough watch for the most part.

Rating: 3/5

Doctor Strange (2016) Movie Review by Stephen McLaughlin

DOCTOR STRANGE

Director: Scott Derrickson
Writers: Jon Spaihts, Scott Derrickson
Stars: Benedict Cumberbatch, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Rachel McAdams, Mads Mikkelsen, Benjamin Bratt

Marvel’s Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) is an interesting and intriguing take on the world of illusion within film. We are introduced to Stephen Strange who is a world class neurosurgeon who also is cocky and has a huge ego. He berates his colleagues and goes out to embarrass them just to make himself look better. Whilst driving to a Medical Dinner to make a speech he loses control of his sports car and skids off the road narrowly escaping death. Strange wakes up from surgery with metal pins all over his hands and realises that his days as a top surgeon are numbered unless he can find a way or method to operate on his hands to put them back to the way they were. Sounds easy right?

Without giving away too much, Benedict Cumberbatch (Star Trek Into Darkness) just nails the character from the very beginning. He rocks as Strange and pulls it off with ease. The impressions his portrayal gives us is that he was born to play the role of the ex-neurosurgeon turned Doctor Strange the Sorcerer. Such is the talent of the lead cast, that it represents just how good the movie was overall. Whenever Strange gets a bit cocky, you can see hints  of Cumberbatch’s Sherlock character sliding in there and Cumberbatch’s sense of humour is suited to the character as the egocentric yet sharp witty guy.

Desperately searching for a way to fix what had happened to him, he is told about a paralysed man who goes by the name of Jonathan Pangborn (Benjamin Bratt) walking perfectly again. Strange at first doesn’t believe this to be possible but after seeing the man in person on a basketball court. Doctor Strange seeks the truth into how this can be happening. Pangborn lets Strange know of an ancient treatment in Nepal only to be drawn into a world of mystic arts.

We are introduced to Mordo played by Chiwetel Ejiofor (12 Years a Slave) who like Morpheus in the Matrix once said “you have to unlearn, what you have learnt”. (Chiwetel Ejiofor (12 Years a Slave) turned in his usual solid work as Mordo, someone who starts out on the right side but turns out to be just too rigid for his own good.) This is true in Strange’s case as his medical background always had him belief that the life’s of so many where in his hands and as the ‘Ancient One’ says in Doctor Strange, “You have been looking through a keyhole to life” and it is true about Strange’s blinkered egotistical view on his life and all the others on his life.

Strange, Mordo and The Ancient One’s first meeting is awkward for the characters as they don’t believe that Strange is capable at first to open his mind, but his persistence to learn the ways of The Ancient One pays off and although his selfish attempts to fix himself to get back to his old life, he discovers a greater evil occurring in the way of fallen student Kaecilius (Mads Mikkelsen) who strives for immortality and believes the ‘Ancient One’ (played by Tilda Swindon  (The Grand Budapest Hotel) really commanded her role as Ancient One) is holding back powers and even makes Strange question his teacher’s explanation on how she has lived so long. But there is a greater case of concern as behind Kaecilius and lurking within the backdrop of the story is Dormammu who only comes into play at the last 15 minutes of the film in a time loop with Strange that I found rather funny as Strange’s persistent annoyance really tests the patience of Dormammu.

Mads Mikkelson (Rogue One: A Star Wars Story) portrays the villain Kaecilius character as well as he can. Although not my favorite villain in MCU, I think Mikkelsen does a fine is a brilliant performer, although he’s a bit of a shallow villain in this and is given very limited time in the movie as is much the same for Rachel McAdams (Southpaw) who was great (and underused) in her role rightly upgraded from, I think Night Nurse (as Rosario Dawson’s Claire Temple is another version of Night Nurse in the same MCU)
to a doctor and she commanded the screen quite equally with Cumberbatch in their scenes together. I hope McAdams is back in further sequels and not dropped as quickly by the MCU in the same way Jane Foster was.

Director Scott Derrickson (The Exorcism of Emily Rose and The Day the Earth Stood Still ) should be commended for the film’s visual appeal. The speculator effects shown in Doctor Strange showing us dimensions never seen before and I have to mention the Director of Photography Ben Davis who previously worked on Kick-Ass, Guardians of the Galaxy and Avengers: Age of Ultron manages to visualise in a way that the audience isn’t lost with what it is witnessing along with Tilda Swinton’s explanation of the world of sorcery.

The visuals were rapid and and eye catching that helped  engage the storyline and the introduction of one of the most interesting Marvel heroes making ‘Doctor Strange’ a must watch for comic book fans and movie goers alike. I do hope Marvel make some more standalone Doctor Strange movies as I feel he would be wasted as just a team member in future productions.